Current:Home > InvestFrench justice minister is on trial accused of conflict of interest -ProsperityStream Academy
French justice minister is on trial accused of conflict of interest
View
Date:2025-04-14 05:03:04
PARIS (AP) — France’s justice minister goes on trial Monday on charges of using his office to settle personal scores, in an unprecedented case that has raised concern about checks and balances in French democracy.
Justice Minister Eric Dupond-Moretti’s refusal to resign, or at least to step aside from his role overseeing France’s justice system during the trial, has drawn wide criticism.
Once a high-profile lawyer, Dupond-Moretti is accused of abusing his position as justice minister to order probes targeting magistrates who investigated him, his friends or his former clients.
He denies wrongdoing. He faces up to five years in prison and half a million euros in fines if convicted on charges of illegal conflict of interest.
The trial marks the first time in modern France that a government minister has been put on trial while still in office, according to legal historians. Until now, it was seen as an unwritten rule that ministers resigned if they were put under investigation.
Dupond-Moretti was appointed justice minister by President Emmanuel Macron in 2020 and has said he will remain in office through the trial, which is due to end on Nov. 17. Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne reiterated her support for Dupond-Moretti on Monday before the trial opened.
He is going on trial in a special court for alleged wrongdoing by the government, the Court of Justice of the Republic. He will face three professional magistrates accompanied by 12 members of parliament, six from the lower house and six from the Senate, who will issue a ruling. A majority of eight votes is required to decide on guilt and sentence.
’’This situation is unprecedented: A justice minister in office is judged by the Court of Justice of the Republic for infractions committed while he carries out his job,” magistrates’ unions said in a statement ahead of the trial.
’’Our organizations consider that this situation damages the credibility of the justice minister, and by ricochet, weakens the entire justice system,” it said.
Dupond-Moretti is considered one of France’s leading criminal lawyers, and is nicknamed the “acquittor” for his record 145 acquittals. Over the past 10 years, he had been increasingly involved in political cases, and his relations with certain magistrates had soured.
Soon after he was named minister, he opened administrative investigations against magistrates in charge of proceedings that had directly concerned him: three magistrates from the national financial prosecutor’s office and a former investigating judge in Monaco.
The investigations found no wrongdoing by the four magistrates.
Magistrates’ unions filed a legal complaint against Dupond-Moretti, saying the investigations were unfounded and an effort to use his role as minister to settle personal scores. The trial focuses on those investigations.
The minister has always maintained that he wanted to avoid any conflict of interest. On his appointment, he signed a document declaring he would defend “integrity and morality” like all other ministers.
Interviewed on public radio last month, Dupond-Moretti said his ministry would not be “abandoned” during the trial. “The ministry will continue to function, that’s my only concern,’' he said.
Dupond-Moretti is viewed as among the left-leaning members of Macron’s government, but critics from left and right have questioned why he didn’t step aside during the trial.
Some politicians also argue that serving government ministers should be tried in traditional courts, where civil parties can also take part, instead of a special court with its own special rules.
veryGood! (59)
Related
- Euphoria's Hunter Schafer Says Ex Dominic Fike Cheated on Her Before Breakup
- Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton working his way into the NBA MVP race
- Raven-Symoné reveals her brother died of colon cancer: 'I love you, Blaize'
- Governor wants New Mexico legislators to debate new approach to regulating assault-style weapons
- Tony Hawk drops in on Paris skateboarding and pushes for more styles of sport in LA 2028
- The best time to see the Geminid meteor shower is this week. Here's how to view.
- Two Georgia election workers sue Giuliani for millions, alleging he took their good names
- Honey Boo Boo's Anna Chickadee Cardwell Privately Married Eldridge Toney Before Her Death at 29
- Messi injury update: Ankle 'better every day' but Inter Miami star yet to play Leagues Cup
- Iraq scrambles to contain fighting between US troops and Iran-backed groups, fearing Gaza spillover
Ranking
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Man charged in Fourth of July parade shooting plans to represent himself at trial
- Car fire at Massachusetts hospital parking garage forces evacuation of patients and staff
- Rohingya Muslims in Indonesia struggle to find shelter. President says government will help for now
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Iraq scrambles to contain fighting between US troops and Iran-backed groups, fearing Gaza spillover
- Former NHL player, coach Tony Granato reveals cancer diagnosis
- Lupita Nyong’o will head the jury at the annual Berlin film festival in February
Recommendation
Clay Aiken's son Parker, 15, makes his TV debut, looks like his father's twin
Europe agreed on world-leading AI rules. How do they work and will they affect people everywhere?
Battle over creating new court centers on equality in Mississippi’s majority-Black capital city
Rescuers have recovered 11 bodies after landslides at a Zambia mine. More than 30 are feared dead
A steeplechase record at the 2024 Paris Olympics. Then a proposal. (He said yes.)
What to know about abortion lawsuits being heard in US courts this week
Second person of interest taken into custody in murder of Detroit synagogue president Samantha Woll
The Excerpt podcast: Appeals court upholds Trump gag order in election interference case